nope - they're actually using Arbitrum right now (confirmed by team)

I don't disagree with any of your points here.

Privacy IS a concern, and World is fighting an uphill battle. That doesn't mean what they're trying to tackle is impossible.

IMO, World has demonstrated that they are taking the steps to decentralize further - what they have now (like pretty much every other crypto project) is not a finished product.

I've never owned any Worldcoin, but I think it can be successful at a large scale if they continue to take the right steps towards security and decentralization.

I agree completely. lots of changes coming to the eco

I appreciate the input - did not intended for this to come off as a shill. My intended takeaway was that proof of personhood is becoming increasingly essential and that World has the best solution for it as of right now. With that said, there are clearly a multitude of risks (which will always exist when a complex, large-scale problem is being tackled).

could you please clarify what about the multi-jurisdiction statement is untrue? How would you envision this happening?

To your other point - I do believe the flagging for fraud is a real (perhaps the biggest) concern. Some examples of how someone could be flagged: "attempting to create duplicate accounts, manipulate votes in governance protocols, sell World IDs, bypass anti-bot measures"

Additionally, World docs say fraud-flagging is decided/reported by the community, but doesn't outline details in depth. I assume this means World maintains at least some control in this area. This definitely gets in the way of World being an "open" ecosystem. Not sure how they'll be able to get around this tbh.

scary hours 👀

AI is a drug