5:14 PM

The Four-Year Cycle Isn’t Dead

Arcana

I’d like to preface this as my personal thesis on where I believe we currently are in the cycle. As we were consolidating back in April and everyone was calling for the end of the cycle, I wasn’t fully sold on the idea that we had topped out.

CT has a short memory, but the market never really forgets. Every cycle, without fail, there’s a point where people start calling for the invalidation of the 4-year cycle – only to be proven that once again, it remains intact. Whether it’s the “supercycle”, “institutional decorrelation”, or macro decoupling, there’s always a narrative that tries to break the standard pattern we’ve been following for years. And yet, here we are again – Bitcoin reaching new all-time highs, altcoins showing signs of strength, and consensus capitulating that it was always a 4-year cycle.

Much of CT had written off the 4-year cycle thesis multiple times over the last year or so. However, what we’re seeing now in 2025 closely resembles the late-stage dynamics of the 2017 run: a top-heavy market increasingly driven by expanding risk-on behavior with alts following BTCs recent ATH momentum.

A Familiar Setup

At this point it’s hard to dismiss t

...

Good one, but "2021-2022 ended with the implosion of Terra, FTX, Celsius". 2021 bull run ended because of rate hikes. FTX collapse was bear market bottom.

That's correct, should have worded it differently. I guess to clarify, Terra, FTX, etc. were just signs that there was still too much leverage in the market. Basically to say that once the liquidity cycle shifts it tips over the remaining dominoes.

Could very well be the case that this cycle also ends on the same premise and any sort of unwinding in DATs begins afterwards

I like the discussion of cycles.