MakerDAO is the largest DeFi protocol by value locked (or TVL), with over $2.5 billion in collateral. Maker is also perhaps the oldest DeFi project, pioneering on-chain governance and financial dApps. The supply of DAI, Maker’s native stablecoin, crossed the coveted $1 billion threshold recently, and Maker’s collateral base grew at an astounding 15% per month between Jan 2018 and Dec 2020.
Yet Maker’s native governance token, MKR, underperformed the so-called blue chips by a wide margin during this year’s DeFi run up. Let’s dive into a few reasons why that might have happened.
Source: TradingView
Competing Against Secondary Markets
First, a short introduction to Maker’s design.
Users can deposit any of several accepted tokens in a Maker vault and borrow the DAI stablecoin against the value of those tokens. The protocol charges borrowers a stability fee for borrowing / minting DAI. This fee is variable and subject to the discretion of Maker governance.
The stability fee collected is used to buy MKR from the open market and burn it. This is the primary source of value accrual for MKR.
DAI is a debt credit that’s pegged to the value of the US dollar. But if you abstract DAI from the Maker stack and replace it with any other stablecoin, it becomes apparent that Maker’s real product is leverage. Most borrowers on Maker deposit assets like ETH and WBTC and use
Unlock Access
Gain complete access to in-depth analysis and actionable insights.
Tap into the industry’s most comprehensive research reports and media content on digital assets.
Be the first to discover exclusive opportunities & alpha
Understand the narratives driving the market
Build conviction with actionable, in-depth research reports
Engage with a community of leading investors & analysts
0 Comments

Hmm it's quiet here.
Be the first to comment on this post!