ETH Staking, Lido Monopoly, Intro to OPtimism

MAY 31, 2022 • 7 Min Read

Joo Kian + 2 others

Disclosure: Delphi Ventures has invested in ETH and LIDO. Members of our team also hold in stETH and are recipients of the OP airdrop. These statements are intended to disclose any conflict of interest and should not be misconstrued as a recommendation to purchase any token. This content is for informational purposes only and you should not make decisions based solely on it. This is not investment advice.

Metus vulputate eu scelerisque felis. Nulla facilisi cras fermentum odio eu. Scelerisque fermentum dui

faucibus in ornare quam viverra orci sagittis. A iaculis at erat pellentesque adipiscing commodo elit. In

fermentum et sollicitudin ac orci. Ultrices sagittis orci a scelerisque purus. Faucibus ornare

suspendisse sed nisi lacus sed viverra tellus in. Mauris cursus mattis molestie a iaculis at erat

pellentesque adipiscing. Volutpat diam ut venenatis tellus in metus vulputate. Eu consequat ac felis

donec et odio pellentesque. Eu mi bibendum neque egestas congue quisque egestas diam. Quam

lacus suspendisse faucibus interdum posuere lorem. Quam id leo in vitae. Ut faucibus pulvinar

elementum integer enim neque. Id ornare arcu odio ut sem nulla pharetra diam sit. Molestie ac feugiat

sed lectus vestibulum mattis. Ipsum nunc aliquet bibendum enim facilisis. Euismod nisi porta lorem

mollis aliquam ut porttitor.

Iaculis nunc sed augue lacus viverra vitae congue eu consequat. Gravida neque convallis a cras.

Nunc scelerisque viverra mauris in aliquam sem. Non odio euismod lacinia at quis risus sed vulputate

odio. Purus faucibus ornare suspendisse sed. Turpis egestas maecenas pharetra convallis posuere

morbi. Nec feugiat nisl pretium fusce id velit ut. Nunc congue nisi vitae suscipit tellus mauris a diam.

Posuere sollicitudin aliquam ultrices sagittis orci. Urna nec tincidunt praesent semper. Turpis nunc

eget lorem dolor sed viverra.

suspendisse sed nisi lacus sed viverra tellus in. Mauris cursus mattis molestie a iaculis at erat

pellentesque adipiscing. Volutpat diam ut venenatis tellus in metus vulputate. Eu consequat ac felis

donec et odio pellentesque. Eu mi bibendum neque egestas congue quisque egestas diam. Quam

lacus suspendisse faucibus interdum posuere lorem. Quam id leo in vitae. Ut faucibus pulvinar

elementum integer enim neque. Id ornare arcu odio ut sem nulla pharetra diam sit. Molestie ac feugiat

sed lectus vestibulum mattis. Ipsum nunc aliquet bibendum enim facilisis. Euismod nisi porta lorem

mollis aliquam ut porttitor.

Iaculis nunc sed augue lacus viverra vitae congue eu consequat. Gravida neque convallis a cras.

Nunc scelerisque viverra mauris in aliquam sem. Non odio euismod lacinia at quis risus sed vulputate

odio. Purus faucibus ornare suspendisse sed. Turpis egestas maecenas pharetra convallis posuere

morbi. Nec feugiat nisl pretium fusce id velit ut. Nunc congue nisi vitae suscipit tellus mauris a diam.

Posuere sollicitudin aliquam ultrices sagittis orci. Urna nec tincidunt praesent semper. Turpis nunc

eget lorem dolor sed viverra.

lacus suspendisse faucibus interdum posuere lorem. Quam id leo in vitae. Ut faucibus pulvinar

elementum integer enim neque. Id ornare arcu odio ut sem nulla pharetra diam sit. Molestie ac feugiat

sed lectus vestibulum mattis. Ipsum nunc aliquet bibendum enim facilisis. Euismod nisi porta lorem

mollis aliquam ut porttitor.

Chart of The Day: >10% of ETH Staked in ETH2

  • For those unfamiliar, Ethereum is set to merge its Beacon Chain with Mainnet, which will transition Ethereum from a Proof-of-Work blockchain to a Proof-of-Stake blockchain. The merge will reduce reward emissions as miners will no longer participate in the consensus mechanism, and transaction fees will flow towards ETH stakers. With the reduction in emissions alongside EIP-1559 burns, Ethereum will likely become net-deflationary post-merge. The merge is expected to happen this year, with Vitalik revealing targets for August and Ethereum’s roadmap showing Q3/Q4 2022. 
  • >12M ETH, representing >10% of ETH’s supply is staked on ETH2 as the merge approaches. The ramp-up is likely due to more validators wanting to participate in securing the network and also yield farmers that want to maximize yields in a low yield environment.
  • ETH staked in ETH2 currently earns ~4% APR, which is expected to double or triple post-merge as the transaction fees will be directed towards stakers. Furthermore, degen farmers can leverage up to 3x equivalent of stETH to boost yields through Aave or DeFiSaver. However, leverage does have risks, which was recently demonstrated by the stETH depeg causing the liquidation of over-levered positions.
  • All eyes will be on the Ropsten Testnet, ETH’s longest-lived Proof-of-Work testnet, which is expected to merge by June 8th.
  • For more on Ethereum, you can check out our Delphi Report on Danksharding here. Pss… It’s available for everyone!

The Lido ‘Monopoly’ and The ICS721 Standard

[Excerpt from a Delphi Insights Report]

  • Synopsis: In response to criticisms from the likes of VitalikSuperphiz, and Danny Ryanwho argue that liquid staking protocols should have a limited stake in a chain, Lido developer Vsh, has created a thread where Lido DAO can debate whether they should self limit their stake on the Ethereum network. Lido controls 30% of all staked ETH, according to the forum thread. Some feel it may become a centralizing force for Ethereum and pose a risk to the entire ecosystem.
  • Forum Arguments for Limiting: Some in the forum see the utility in Lido limiting its stake. One user argues that a temporary limit is reasonable, but only to allow time for competitors to catch up. Other users wonder how long Ethereum will allow Lido to exist as a potential threat to its decentralization – especially if it controls a large portion of the stake. They worry that Ethereum could hard fork and slash Lido validators in the name of decentralization.
  • Forum Arguments Against Limiting: Twitter thread king, Adam Cochrane, argued that Lido limiting itself would allow for less altruistic competitors to emerge and steal its market share. He cites centralized exchanges as being the main competitive threat to Lido. He feels that Lido should instead work on building centralization guardrails rather than limiting itself. Some users feel that the argument that Lido should limit itself lacks nuance and understanding of Lido’s incentives – with one user posting a lengthy, technical rebuttal. Additionally, Adam reminds everyone that stETH doesn’t represent ETH staked in a single host, so Lido controlling a large percentage of stETH is immaterial. Sadcat argues that the proposed solutions disproportionately harm Lido and instead proposes a deposit fee when Lido’s stETH share is above a certain threshold. However, Cobie presents a strong argument that changing fee structures for users who can’t exit is potentially fraudulent. He also points out that if a system requires DApps to act altruistically, it probably won’t survive when mercenary capital enters the space.
  • Our Position: Although we are sympathetic to both views in this debate, we generally agree with Cobie and Adam’s arguments. Lido’s validator set, which uses the ETH, is generally decentralized, with the ETH spread around to different validator groups. And as Cobie says, if a protocol needs to limit itself for the base layer’s security, the base layer is fragile and won’t survive mercenary capital entering the space. Lido actively limiting itself until competitors show up seems short-sighted, as those competitors may not act altruistically and would seek to monopolize liquid staking. Instead, Lido should develop the internal ‘guardrails’ that users in the forum have mentioned and Lido is currently working on. Another consideration against the threat of Lido centralization is if someone gained control of the network through Lido and enacted damaging practices like multi-block reorgs, or censoring transactions, it would most likely kill the value of the network. This would reduce the value controlled by the validators and potentially cause capital to flee the ecosystem. So taking over a Lido monopoly may be feasible, but there doesn’t seem to be much incentive. We have tried our best to summarize this debate, but we have not done it credit here. We highly recommend that anyone holding ETH, stETH, LDO, or any Ethereum token give this thread a read. Ethereum’s move to PoS affects the entire network, especially how it intersects with liquid staking, and those interacting with it or holding wealth secured by it should follow this thread.
  • For more, Delphi members can see the full DAO Insights here.

Glass Half Full on OPtimism

[Excerpt from a Delphi Pro Report]

  • OP launched with an initial total supply of 4.3B tokens inflating at 2%/year. 1.3B tokens (~30% of the supply) will be unlocked initially and consists of:
    • Airdrop 1: 215M
    • OP Stimpack Phase 0: 36M
    • OP Stimpack Phase 1: 195M
    • RetroPGF: 859M

RetroPGF

  • The main responsibility of the Citizen’s House is the governance of retroPGF. This fund retroactively distributes funding to projects which guarantee a form of compensation for good actors. The mechanism was initially set forth by Vitalik who describes the motivation behind it as “it’s easier to agree on what was useful than what will be useful.” The goal of retroPGF is to financially incentivize the development of public goods in a sustainable and objective way. Public goods can be thought of as products/services that although many want to use no one wants to pay for; oftentimes due to the free-rider problem.
  • The first iteration of retroPGF distribution was Oct 2021 when $1M was distributed to 58 projects. Top reward recipients included $51k to Ethersjs (compact, feature-complete library to interact with the Ethereum blockchain) and $45k to go-ethereum (Go implementation of the Ethereum protocol). Both projects are free resources that have all bettered the Ethereum community while operating with no expected rewards.
  • As a self-operating mechanism, it’s vital for RetroPGF to generate sustainable revenue. This begs the question of where these funds come from. There are 3 revenue sources in play here:
    • 20% of the initial OP supply + 2% yearly inflation: This initial allocation is distributed at the discretion of the Citizens’ House. 
    • Fee Scalar: a multiplier on the estimated L1 security cost (currently set at 1.5x) to account for Ethereum’s gas price volatility. Sometimes there’s no discrepancy in gas costs and the charged premium is left unused. Rather than being returned to the user, excess fees go directly to funding retroPGF.
  • For more, Delphi Members can see the full Delphi Pro Report here.

Notable Tweets

Ropsten Testnet to Merge

DeFi Saver Launches on Arbitrum & Optimism

Velodrome on Optimism

Create a free account to continue reading

Go Pro at 40% off

Immediately access the entire catalog of research for Delphi, Office Hours & private Discord

Joo Kian + 2 others