TLDR
Every memecoin launch has the same villain. Someone bundles the opening block, sits on a big slice of supply and sells it into everyone who shows up after. Most launchpads try to stop the bundle. Mosh builds it on purpose, crowdfunds it, locks it forever and hands the inventory to a swarm of AI agents that make the market with it.
$BUN (Bundle Cat) is the first token launched this way.
The team funded its bundle with 8 ETH and earned it back in fees inside the first minute of trading. 3 weeks in, 71% of BUN supply still sits in agent vaults and the agents can trade that inventory only inside contract limits and nobody can withdraw it. The people who fund a Mosh bundle can’t exit and can’t sell their share. They get 80% of the pool’s creator fees instead, on every trade by anyone, paid in ETH. For BUN, the team plans to route those fees back into buying BUN through Mosh’s Agentic Liquid Fund.
Mosh is in a gated beta, with the team opening launch access to BUN holders first and full access next. It runs on Pons only which already takes 92% of launchpad fees on Robinhood Chain. Mosh isn’t competing for launches which is what I love about this as we have too many launchpads and not much incremental improvement in the underlying technology (each pad is just incrementally different from each other; some allows you to launch against multiple pairs etc but no real change in the mechanism really). Mosh and their flagship BUN token makes launches on the dominant venue behave better.
Fwiw this isn’t a case to buy BUN, but why I’m bullish on the tech and what would prove me wrong. Disclosure: I hold BUN. This piece is not financial advice.
The Bundle Problem
The standard launch script goes like this:
> Early wallets load up in the first blocks (often one entity spread across many wallets).
> Hype peaks.
> Those wallets sell.
> Volume dries up.
> Everyone moves on.
Launchpads have mostly answered with friction. Pons V2 opens e
...